Sunday, November 18, 2012

Iocastê (OR Why I Hate Drama Critics)



Iocastê from the Greek play “Oedipus the King” is often viewed by critics to be a very flat, one dimensional character. She is viewed as such because she seems to only ever be reacting to those around her and she has no real emotions and she would not hold up as an actual person if removed from the play and placed in the real world. However all of Iocastê’s actions speak to just how badly she wishes to remain in power and the lengths she is willing to go to keep her place as queen of Thebes. Hunger for power is motivation enough to cause actual people to kill one another, it is also enough motivation to give Iocastê the depth and dimensions that most critics seem to miss.
The first sign of Iocastê’s hunger for power occurs before the play even begins. She allows her husband to take their newborn son, pierce his ankles and send him away to die in the wild. No woman in her right mind would allow that to happen to her newborn child, no matter how controlling her husband is. Iocastê is aware of what the prophecy says and knows that if the child was allowed to live the stress of worrying about the eventual fulfillment of the prophecy would likely drive her husband to an early grave resulting in the loss of her throne. In order to remain in that seat of power Iocastê does the unthinkable and supports her husband in sending away their only child. The only other course of action that Iocastê could have taken at this point would have been to kill the child herself, and though she is selfish and power hungry even she cannot take that action for fear that Laϊos will banish her in disgust.
Again before we even are allowed to view the action Iocastê acts upon her hunger and follows through with a plan that will ensure that she remains in her station. She has received news that Laϊos had been killed and her city has been set upon by a Sphinx. Thebes is not doing so well and Iocastê must be frantic with worry, the people won’t remove her from her throne during a time of trouble but having a Sphinx terrorizing your city isn’t good. Oedipus seems to be the solution to all of her problems. He solves the riddle of the Sphinx, the people of Thebes reward him by asking him to become their king, and he just happens to be unmarried. Iocastê does the only thing that will keep her in power, she marries Oedipus. A man she knows almost nothing about, a man she has only just met, a man who bears an uncanny resemblance to her late husband. It is safe to assume that by this point Iocastê has some suspicions about who Oedipus really is, suspicions that are only made stronger when the only surviving member of Laϊos’ party requests to be stationed far, far away from Oedipus.
In Scene Two Iocastê enters in the middle of Creon and Oedipus’ fight and straightway attempts to get Oedipus away from Creon. She doesn’t ask what they are fighting about she just tries to get them separated. Iocastê knows that if things between the two men become too hostile it will probably come to blows which, in that time, involved swords and death. There is a good chance that if swords are drawn that Oedipus would end up slain or very gravely injured, both of which would result in less power and status for Iocastê. Getting the men to cease fighting holds another less obvious benefit; the citizens of the Thebes would no longer be able to hear them. By this point in time it is likely that the news of the oracles declaration concerning the sickness would have spread to the general public of Thebes and this argument comes too close to revealing the truth about Oedipus.
Later in Scene Two, at line 182 Iocastê attempts to get Oedipus to forget all that the oracle had to say about the sickness plaguing Thebes. She does this by telling the prophecy that led to what she assumed was the death of her child. It is only when Oedipus beings to ask questions that she realizes something in her plan has gone awry. What Iocastê is unaware of is the prophecy that Oedipus received that was strikingly similar to the one she and Laϊos got about their son. When Oedipus asks about what Laϊos looked like and how many were with him she responds in the only way she can, with the truth. She cannot lie because she is not the only person that has seen Laϊos and she is not the only person who saw his party leave. If she lied to him all it would take for her lies to unravel is Oedipus asking one other person about Laϊos and then he would know that she had lied to him. Oedipus as the king and her husband could expel her from the city for something like that, which Iocastê would not be able to handle because her power is all important to her.
After hearing Oedipus’ account of his life before Thebes Iocastê again tries to get Oedipus to drop this line of inquiry.  Oedipus states that the shepherd is vital to figuring out if he killed Laϊos or not and Iocastê responds with:
You may be sure that he said there were several;
And can he call back that story now? He can not.
The whole city heard it as plainly as I.
But suppose he alters some detail of it:
He can not ever show that Laϊos’ death
Fulfilled the oracle: for Apollo said
My child was doomed to kill him; and my child-
Poor baby!- it was my child that died first.
(Sophocles lines 320-27)
Even as Oedipus is almost certain that he has killed Laϊos, Iocastê makes an effort to place doubts in his mind. An effort that seems to have worked as Oedipus seems to be less concerned about what the shepherd has to say and only wants to hear from him in order to settle the matter.
            The last time that we see Iocastê is in Scene Three when a messenger arrives from Corinth to alert Oedipus about the death of his father. Iocastê, thinking that this is great blessing that will convince Oedipus for once and for all that oracles are not to be trusted, calls for Oedipus to come here the news in person. This is where Iocastê makes the biggest mistake of her life; she does not send the messenger away before trying to convince Oedipus. Even with all her planning she could not prevent one simple messenger from destroying all of her hard work. Once she realizes her folly, Iocastê goes from being a calm and collected woman to a mastermind in total panic. Iocastê begs and pleads that Oedipus leave the story alone and doesn’t search further for his true parentage. When it becomes clear that she has failed she leaves with these rather ominous parting words, “Ah, miserable! / That is the only word I have for you now. / That is the only word I can ever have,” (Sophocles lines 151-52).
            It isn’t until the Éxodos that we learn that Iocastê has killed herself. The thought of losing her station in life and her power is too much for her to deal with and she takes her own life before the things that matter the most to her in life can be taken from her. Her last line “That is the only word I can ever have,” (Sophocles p. 974 l.152) shows her true feelings about not being in power and not being of high status. She would be miserable and that is all that she would have been, in order to save herself from that misery she concocts a plan and follows through.
From birth to death Iocastê did everything she could to be in a position of power over those around her. It pushed her and motivated her to do things that others would see as illogical and wrong. It caused her to have no love for any person but herself. Iocastê’s insatiable hunger for power placed her in a position where death was the only option to her and she did not hesitate to take it. Apologies to the critics, but Iocastê is anything but a flat, one dimensional character.

My Sisters Mom and Me!